On a lazy Sunday morning 72 years
ago, American Army and Navy bases at Pearl Harbor were attacked by warplanes of
the Imperial Japanese Navy. More than 2,000 Americans were killed and more than
1,000 were injured.
At dawn that Sunday, forces of
the Empire of Japan attacked the U. S. Pacific Fleet and other military
targets. Their goal was to cripple the fleet, allowing Japan to attack and
capture the Philippines and Indo-China. This would grant Japan access to badly
needed raw materials that would enhance the Empire’s plans to conquer and
occupy Australia, New Zealand, and India. The Japanese believed that this would
allow them to gain military and political control of East, Southeast, and South
Asia as well as the entirety of the Pacific Ocean. The only thing standing in
their way was the U.S. Pacific Fleet.
Japanese Admiral Yamamoto
conceived and planned the attack, although he did not intend war with the
United States. Yamamoto had first hand knowledge of American industrial
strength and our material wealth. He also recognized America’s temperament and
was unwilling to test it. Yamamoto
was a practical man, but his superiors were less so and were quite
arrogant. Yamamoto was overruled, and being the good soldier and loyal subject,
he applied his efforts as Commander in Chief of the Imperial Combined Fleet to
a successful attack.
Yamamoto knew that the decision
was a terrible mistake, and following the attack was quoted as saying "…we
have awakened a sleeping giant and have instilled in him a terrible resolve…"
Yamamoto was right. The Admiral perhaps knew that by this one act Japan had doomed their plans to failure. Ironically Japan could have gained the coveted geography without attacking the U.S. Fleet. Pearl Harbor became the worst strategic mistake they could have made.
Yamamoto was right. The Admiral perhaps knew that by this one act Japan had doomed their plans to failure. Ironically Japan could have gained the coveted geography without attacking the U.S. Fleet. Pearl Harbor became the worst strategic mistake they could have made.
Prior to the
attack the U. S. had written the Philippines off, assuming a strictly defensive
posture against Japan. The attack resulted in immediate reaction and
unprecedented unity from the American people and among the fractured political
factions. Americans of every class sent sons and daughters to war as mothers entered
the industrial work force. Every resource possessed by the U.S. was brought to
bear. Until Pearl Harbor our war efforts were focused on Europe. Following the
attack we turned our efforts to the complete defeat of Japan at any cost.
As Yamamoto feared, our industrial
strength and the will of our people was the foundation for victory. Japan
simply could not replace lost resources in the way we could. In many of the
Pacific battles our military did not fair so well, but even with tactical
losses we very often still gained strategic victory.
As we closed in on the Japanese
homeland, the Samurai culture within the Japanese military displayed their
desperation, and resulted in the Kamikaze attacks on our Navy. Japanese culture
dictated that dying for the Emperor was a high honor and scoffed at the
disgrace of surrender. Our military leaders recognized that taking the mainland
would come at high cost. If Okinawa taught us anything it was this. Invasion of the Japanese homeland appeared out of the
question.
Back home our laboratories were
busy developing the nuclear weapons that would bring a quick
termination of the War in the Pacific, but at a terrible cost in human life and suffering.
Conservative estimates tell us that 225,000 died in the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and that as many more suffered lifelong effect. It was a decision where there could be no correct outcome.
Many Americans lived that surly would have been killed in any conventional assault, but one of the lingering questions remaining from that war has yet to be answered. Might there have been a way to have won this war yet avoid the unleashing of the nuclear dogs? We will never know. Philosophers and pundits will forever debate, and the answer will forever remain in the realm of speculation.
Conservative estimates tell us that 225,000 died in the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and that as many more suffered lifelong effect. It was a decision where there could be no correct outcome.
Many Americans lived that surly would have been killed in any conventional assault, but one of the lingering questions remaining from that war has yet to be answered. Might there have been a way to have won this war yet avoid the unleashing of the nuclear dogs? We will never know. Philosophers and pundits will forever debate, and the answer will forever remain in the realm of speculation.
###
0 Comments:
Post a Comment