Showing posts with label Creationism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Creationism. Show all posts

December 19, 2012

New Orleans Schools Reject Creationism

No Teacher ‘Shall Teach Any Aspect Of Religious Faith As Science’ 

By Zack Beauchamp on Dec 19, 2012 at 11:49 am

A Louisiana school district voted on Wednesday to ban from its schools any textbooks and school curricula that follows the guidelines of Texas’ extreme, ideological standards. 

Texas approved a hard-right curriculum in 2010 that taught utterly misleading assertions as fact — suggesting, for example, that Senator Joseph McCarthy’s anti-Communist witch hunt had been vindicated and that the Crusades didn’t happen. But Orleans Parish (which covers New Orleans) schools were so worried about the spread of misinformation that it approved explicit rules in protest of Texas’s guidelines, requiring teachers to teach accurate historical and scientific information which wouldn’t necessarily be conveyed under Texas rules: 

“No history textbook shall be approved which has been adjusted in accordance with the State of Texas revisionist guidelines nor shall any science textbook be approved which presents creationism or intelligent design as science or scientific theories…No teacher of any discipline of science shall teach any aspect of religious faith as science or in a science class,” it reads. “No teacher of any discipline of science shall teach creationism or intelligent design in classes designated as science classes.” 

Though Texas cannot legally require the teaching of creationism, Governor Rick Perry (R-TX) has said “we teach both creation and evolution our public schools” as a consequence of his policy choices. 

Two years ago, proposed Texas textbook changes sparked outrage by rewriting history along right-wing lines and minimizing slavery. While not fully successful, the watered-down version still conveyed an entirely skewed vision of history. A recent review of the books, for example, found a consistent pattern of viciously negative portrayals of Muslims and Islam. 

 UPDATE

A state law, the Louisiana Science Education Act, opens the door to teaching creationism in schools. The Orleans County vote was aimed to be a protest against this state law.

###

October 24, 2011

So what else did your talking snake tell you?

From a couple weeks ago... Scientific American guest blogger Jessica Fostvedt, a Biology and Religious Studies graduate student at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, discusses Harold Camping and the reason humans fall for End of the World propheteers.


"Many neurologists have proposed the existence of a “God Spot”, a region of the brain linked to belief in the supernatural. Even though no such neural pathways were found that differed from those of non-believers, there is still much debate as to the origin of religion and its evolutionary significance."


###

October 12, 2011

The persistance of Christianity?

Why is it that when a non-believer confronts one of the faithful the argument invariably turns on demands that we must prove mythical beliefs wrong? In all aspects of science and in the law the burden of proof rests with the person asserting the positive claim. Proving or disproving a hypothesis is a relatively simple process for the scientist, but apparently quite difficult for the faithful.
Literature, history and science yields untold examples of rational, scientific and theoretical thought, but the Bible is not considered literature, history or science. Perhaps it should be… but it isn’t. We might wonder why Christianity is so underrepresented, but clearly it is because scientists, historians and theoreticians reject the concept of miracles. This renders the Bible moot and relegates Jesus to the status of street corner evangelist.
But if we were to accept the claims of divine creation, how would we prove it? If we are to take the whole of academia as guidance… we can’t… which leaves the real question; Why does the myth survive if there can be found not a single shred of evidence for the Christian story of creation, yet evidence disproving Biblical explanations abound? The answer is as simple as brainwashing.
It is not necessary to prove fact or fiction if we are able to convince the mind to accept theory without evidence. The Jesuit Francisco de Jassu y (St. Francis) Xavier said “Give me a child until the age of seven and I will give you the man.” That same creed is still practiced by the Jesuits, as well as in schools across the globe. It was a foundation stone for the Third Reich and is said to have been a favorite quote of Josef Stalin.
Adults tend to be skeptical and are far more able to sift fact from fiction. For this reason cultists and politicians alike strive to indoctrinate the children at the earliest possible age. Witness the ongoing battles waged by Christians to teach creationism as part of the science curriculum in our public schools.
What kind of “truth” is it that must be taught to the immature mind that a more mature person might reject? As humans mature we develop what Michael Shermer calls a “Baloney Detector,” but children exposed to early brainwashing will not have fully developed these critical thinking skills. Children intrinsically trust that which adults teach, and adults with an agenda are quick to take advantage of this.
Christians are Christian not due to truth or evidence, but because they are born into an environment intent upon brainwashing children at an early age.  Just like all religions across the globe, Christianity is cultural and fails to be representative of the truth.
###

April 25, 2011

Verbatim

TFN: April 25, 2011, by Jose

Publisher Proposes Creationist Materials



The Texas Education Agency has released proposed supplemental web-based materials for science courses from publishers who want their product in your child’s classroom as early as the 2011-2012 school year.
But there’s a problem with at least one of those publishers that represents a potential leap backward for science education in Texas.
International Databases, Inc., a previously unknown company apparently based in New Mexico, has submitted materials that make no attempt to hide a slant toward creationism and intelligent design, and away from established scientific fact.

Submissions by International Databases and other publishers can be reviewed at the Texas Education Agency website
.
Below are a few examples of attacks on evolution and creationist statements in International Databases’ materials found during a preliminary review by TFN and the NCSE (click on each image to enlarge):
Module 1: Origin Nucleotide (slide 19)
Since such materialistic, self organization scenarios now have a history of scientific
insufficiency for explaining the Origin of Life on Earth, the Null hypothesis (default) stands.
This allows for the testing of the legitimate scientific hypothesis……Life on Earth is the
result of intelligent causes.
Module 8: Teacher Resources (Slide 3)
…at the end of the instructional unit on the Origins of Life, students should go home with
the understanding that a new paradigm of explaining life’s origins is emerging from the failed
attempts of naturalistic scenarios. This new way of thinking is predicated upon the
hypothesis that intelligent input is necessary for life’s origins.
Module 7: Null Hypothesis (Slide 7)
This module sets up two competing explanations for the origin of life: “Non-intelligent
Causes” vs. “Intelligent Causes.” The clear intent is to make a case for an intelligent
designer. The slide below tells students that “until advocates of non-intelligent causes
sustain their claim,” students must accept that life on earth is a result of intelligent causes.
Module 7: Scientific Method (Slide 6)
Many scientists have adopted an unproven hypothesis upon which to build their theories
regarding the origin of life and its’ diversification. This ‘foundation’ is called scientific
materialism, naturalism, and so forth… There are other scientists who have adopted the
unproven hypothesis that an intelligence is necessary to explain both the origin, and
diversification of life on Earth. This view follows from the human experience that teaches
order (complexity) results from intelligent action.
We’ll remind you that it was the SBOE that opened the door to a submission like International Databases’.
In 2009, the SBOE approved new science curriculum standards that call into question the established, mainstream science supporting evolution. At the time, TFN and NCSE warned that the new standards would encourage some vendors and groups to submit textbooks and other instructional materials promoting creationist claims and other pseudoscience in Texas science classrooms.
You have the opportunity to weigh in. Contact the SBOE by email atreview.adoption@tea.state.tx.us before the July meeting and tell them to stand up for science and reject creationist materials in public schools.

March 29, 2011

Why America is no longer exceptional


This is one of the more damning reports I believe I’ve ever read.

“81 percent of seniors from our top fifty-five colleges and universities failed a test of basic U.S. history questions drawn from a national exam designed for high school seniors.  Only 22 percent knew, for example, that the words “government of the people, by the people, for the people” came from Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address.  If most American youngsters don’t learn about their nation’s history in the K-12 years, they are unlikely ever to learn about it.”

From a History News Network article. Read the whole story HERE.

The sad part about this is we don’t seem to ever learn that putting dogmatists in charge of educational content contributes to the decline of understanding and knowledge. Judging from recent ballot victories, this might be just what the majority of Americans want.

The discussion in this report is about history, but social studies and science are also under dogmatist attack. Witness a recent opinion piece in Forbes, another in the Palm Beach Post, and some of the work coming from the Texas SBOE.

I'm sorry. The people who vote Republican want conservative, but that is not what they are getting. The Republican party long ago married itself to the "social" conservatives, and those now make up the vast majority of the biggoted dogmatists who have floated to the top of the right wingnut cesspool.

I'm all in favor of fiscal conservatism, but that goal will remain unachievable so long as these science deniers and historical revisionists remain in power. Their brand of "conservatism" more resembles the dream of the Taliban than that of the Founders of our nation. 

###

October 13, 2010

Voting against their values


NYC based Standard Newswire bills itself as little more than a conservative news aggregator:

“Standard Newswire is a cost-effective and efficient newswire service for public policy groups, government agencies, PR firms, think-tanks, watchdog groups, advocacy groups, coalitions, foundations, colleges, universities, activists, politicians, and candidates to distribute their press releases to journalists who truly want to hear from them.”

What Standard Newswire truly represents though… is a never-ending source of quackery, wooism and Christian extremism. Occasionally I click over there to read some of their stuff for no reason other than the entertainment value. They solicit press releases from fringe groups and function as a purveyor of anything and everything anti-Obama, and anything from the extreme religious right.

The most recent press release, while shocking in nature is really only vaguely surprising considering the source (Houston-based, christianist-oriented, teabagger-funded, Patriot Pac.)

But even for the teabaggers this offering by Patriot PAC seems to be over the edge. Touting a bizarrely titled “Operation Black Storm;” the PAC has launched an effort focused on electing African-American Republicans.

“Today marks the beginning of the end of playing the race card to silence conservative voices and keep blacks voting opposite their core values.”

Question #1 – Exactly what core values have African-Americans been voting against?

“It’s finally time for our nation to get past racial barriers in politics, and with Operation Black Storm we intend to send a message to Washington that–above all–Americans of all backgrounds, colors, and decent faiths want their God-given right for SELF-RULE.”

Question #2 – Are we being led to believe that some faiths are decent while some not so decent?

Question #3 – What is meant by "SELF-RULE?"

Following the Patriot PAC link brings you first to a truly bizarre video comparing U.S. ex-Presidents to the likes of Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Saddam Hussein and Hugo Chavez. One by one we see images of a century of Presidents, each with the word “progressive” superimposed, and some alleged sin detailed below.

Woodrow Wilson brought us the Federal Reserve System, FDR gave us the New Deal, Lyndon Johnson waged the War on Poverty, and Jimmy Carter fathered the Department of Education. A little faux pas slips in with the inclusion of Teddy Roosevelt, whom they claim supported eugenics. This is possibly a true statement, but I suspect the allegation comes from a controversial 1910 quote attributed to Roosevelt:

"Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty, of the good citizen of the right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world."

Whether that statement truly means that the ex-President (Teddy left office in 1909) actually supported eugenics is conjecture, but the fact that the allegation might not be correct isn’t really the funny part. The real problem for the loonies is that Teddy was a Republican, and the statement sounds so very much like the separatist oratory so often heard from the extreme right wing.

Next comes the piece de resistance, as the Sheppard Fairey multihued image of Obama’s profile fades in. Superimposed over the photo are the words, “The ‘progression’ continues.” This is followed by the usual wingnut list of Obama transgressions… healthcare reform, cap & trade, etc... but they screw up again by including the George W. Bush initiated TARP fund and the Wall Street bailouts, falsely trying to lay the blame for the dispised programs at Obama’s feet.

The video is ludicrous, but the outright lies, hatemongering and disingenuousness of it all is right up there with the best of Tea Party rhetoric.

The Black Storm list of African-American Congressional candidates are mostly unknown to me, with the exception of the Rev. Stephen Broden, who is running for Texas District 30 against incumbent Democrat Eddie Bernice Johnson. Although Johnson is embroiled in a ridiculous scandal over awarding scholarships to ineligible friends and family, Broden is a Bible-thumping nut who would be less than useless in Congress. 

Johnson needs to go, but Broden is certainly not the lesser of evils.

Since I know Broden for what he is; an extremist, bible thumping, hell fire and brimstone, christianist wingnut… and we likely can safely assume that the other endorsees fall into a similar category... it seems reasonable to assume that those “core values” mentioned in the first quote are extreme fundamentalist in nature.

This wing of the teabagger right is dead set on instilling the fear of tyranny and associating Obama with evil. Now they are attempting to recruit traditionally safe Democrat votes into their fold. Something tells me the average African-American voter has a longer memory that that.

True tyranny lies in their desires to impose christianist “values” on a free nation. The Ronald Reagan quote mentioned in the video is correct in that regard…

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”
~~  

May 25, 2010

Rational conversation with irrational people

Young earth creationists are an animated lot. Of course not all of them are exactly the same as any other. In fact I don’t think I’ve ever found two Xtians with totally identical beliefs. Like all mythologies, Xtianism is a cafeteria system. Don’t like beets? Try the cabbage with bacon. Oh, and I’ll have a little of that mac and cheese too.

Anyway, as I was saying, the young earth lot appear more animated than your stodgy, run-of-the-mill creationist. It seems easier to offend a young-earther with even the simplest of logic.

Take science. Young-earthers deny most science. They especially deny anything remotely Darwinian in nature. Evolution is a direct threat to young earth myth, and bible thumpers do not like their simple minds to be threatened. They tend to react in remarkably un-christ like fashion.

Don’t you find that odd? Gandhi’s insightful words come to mind.

Anyway, I was talking about how young-earthers deny the scientific disciplines. But even this is like I said before… a cafeteria-like situation. They deny physical, biological, chemical and geological evidence of evolution, yet they are perfectly willing to use physics, biology, chemistry and geology when the product can be twisted to support the delusion of the day.

Take the Shroud of Turin. It was perfectly okay to accept carbon dating as evidence of the age of the shroud, but using the same method to determine the age of fossils is dismissed as god testing our faith. The results of the first are sound, those of the second somehow altered by the hand of god to see if we are on our toes.

Guess I flunked that test.

So, you might wonder, what exactly was the muse for this bit of musing…

Well, you see, when I got home today I found a book in a plastic bag hanging from my door. It was a book I had loaned a neighbor a few days ago.

We’ve had something going on in the neighborhood that has caused neighbor to visit neighbor a bit more frequently than in the past, and a few days ago this neighbor came by. We had coffee and a conversation that led to me deciding to loan him a book. The book was Carl Sagan’s, The Dragons of Eden.

Today I found it hanging from my door in a plastic bag, with a typed note stuffed between the pages. Oh, and I do mean typed. Like on an old fashioned manual Royal or Underwood.

This is what the note said, reproduced as accurately as I can manage.

Dear M. Breath,
I am returning your book “The Dragons of Eden” simply because I am not in agreement with this “Darwinian hogwash.” I read approximately one and a half pages and came to the conclusion; this book is totally the opposite of what I strongly believe. Whatsinaname?????
DRAGONS: Devils/ iniquity
EDEN: God’s creation
Each individual human being has been given free will. He or she has the freedom to choose what they want to believe. I choose to believe “In the beginning, God created man in his own image.” (GENESIS 1-1) The Earth is only 5790 years old!!! The fossil record was formed in the great flood of Noah’s day. Notwithstanding, this is my choice of what I’ve accepted to believe. If you want to believe this evolution crap, that’s your choice and I’ll respect your choice. Furthermore, I also believe that dinosaurs walked the earth with humans. (Why do you think there are so many dragon legends?) “Behold new, Behemeth…” (JOB 40:15)
     It is my opinion that Sagan’s book is what the Apostle Paul prophesied in his first epistle to Timothy 4:1 “But the Spirit explicitly says that in latter times some will fall away from faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons.
     Respectfully,
     B. Thumper

This particular neighbor is one with whom I’ve been quite friendly, and have helped him out in the past when he fell on hard times. Over the past year or so he’s gotten involved with a new “cowboy” church that popped up a few miles away. Apparently he was in some sort of substance abuse situation and used the church as a crutch to heal himself. In the past months he has turned into quite the religious man. I guess I hadn’t correctly gauged just how religious.

The ignorance of this note is palpable, which doesn’t sound like him at all. I’m still digesting it all, but right now I’m leaning toward outside influence. I’m thinking my neighbor visited with his preacher, and Mr. Preacherman guided him to the good Xtian evaluation of a book that challenged Mr. Preacherman’s kingdom.

The rest of the story is yet to come. I’m sure I’ll learn more in days to come.
~~

April 23, 2010

Texas Governor's Race

Bill White, the Democrat challenging incumbent Texas Governor Rick Perry, has found a sore spot to pick.

It’s almost May, which means that the Texas State Board of Education (SBOE) is near to finalizing the laughable social studies curriculum revision for Texas public schools.  Just about everybody has weighed in on this potential debacle, and now Bill White is leveling his guns. Rick Perry, you see, appointed the clown leading this circus.

White was in Austin Saturday speaking to teachers at the Association of Texas Professional Educators convention. Speaking broadly on some of the education challenges facing Texas, White told a packed room what he plans to do to make sure students are better prepared to enter the workforce. He also talked about what he calls a flawed testing system, challenges with the student-to-teacher ratio and how many Texans are being priced out of higher education.

Pointing at the state’s high dropout rate, White said "I'll be active in leadership, in bringing kids back to school. There's many strategies to do it, not just one solution. We need to start early with early childhood educations that work, prepare young people for the classroom. They've proved to be a high return on investment."

The main focus of the talk, however, took aim at recent amendments the State Board of Education made to social studies curriculum standards; amendments written by the overwhelmingly right wing and creationist members of the board.

In a 10-5 vote on March 12, the SBOE gave preliminary approval to the new standards, even though they were opposed by leading experts in the field and by reasonable people everywhere. They are changes dictated by politics and ideology rather than truth or educational interests.

Speaking to this, White said that a line needs to be drawn between what politicians want, and those who make front-line decisions on education. "The amendment process injected politics into our school books and classrooms," White has said, and that was "a step in the wrong direction."

White called on Gov. Rick Perry to urge the SBOE chair to send the amendments back to the original curriculum review teams, a move already laughed off by Perry.

White wants to be sure Texans are well equipped to enter the workforce, something that will be crippled if our educational standards are less than world class. Because Texas is one of the largest purchasers of textbooks nationally, the curriculum changes could resonate across the country. The debate has already garnered national attention with other states already making moves to limit the damage.

White called on Perry today to ask lame duck SBOE chair McLeroy to delay the vote until newly elected board members are in office. This would be a wise and reasonable move, which is exactly why Perry will likely reject it.

Some of the flat-earthers on the board were defeated in recent primary elections, and one has voluntarily decided against seeking reelection. Delaying the vote until a new board is seated would likely cause the amendments to fail. White recognizes this, and likely so does Perry.

"Texas voters have voted against those who are extreme and hyper-political," said White campaign spokesperson Katy Bacon. "If Rick Perry won't show some leadership about the process, he should at least respect Texans who've said they don't want the current, controversial SBOE making decisions about their children's future."

It isn’t just the Democratic challenger who recognizes McLeroy for the nutjob he is.  McLeroy has engaged in such extreme antics that the Texas Senate refused to confirm him in 2009, the second time Perry appointed him, and he was defeated in the spring primary election. 


This isn’t a new windmill for White. Nearly a month ago he called on Perry to ask McLeroy to send amendments back to the original curriculum review teams. Perry responded, saying of the SBOE that he was not going to "try to outsmart them."

Think about that one for a moment…

Since White started making his comments about having the revised standards sent back to expert review teams, the Texas Council for the Social Studies and the Texas Social Studies Supervisors Association have weighed in saying, "state education standards should be balanced and neutral and not reflective of political viewpoints."

The Chair of the SBOE is appointed by the Governor. The 15-member board is elected to represent districts. The Board currently is dominated by Christian, creationist extremists who were elected in part because of the gerrymandering back in 2001.

More importantly though, they were elected because the religious right targeted the SBOE as a priority, knowing that the way to increase their ranks was to be found in the creative revisionism of curriculum standard, such as we see now.

Much of this happened while reasonable Texans were not looking. It was a conspiracy, and we slept through it. We’re awake now and recognize that we have to put all our efforts into reversing the damage. The Governor’s race is important, and so is the 2012 election when the entire 15-member SBOE is up for election. We must stay focused on that.

~~

March 8, 2010

Evolution is hooey…

So quoth James McLeroy, the now lame duck member and former Chair of the Texas State Board of Education. McLeroy has led the charge to insert revisionist history and denialist science into Texas school textbooks since appointed to his position in September 2008, by our revisionist, secessionist, religionist governor, Rick Perry.


In an interview with Mariah Blake, writing for Washington Monthly, McLeroy spoke of the way he evaluates textbooks, saying “The secular humanists may argue that we are a secular nation, but we are a Christian nation founded on Christian principles… The way I evaluate history textbooks is first I see how they cover Christianity and Israel. Then I see how they treat Ronald Reagan—he needs to get credit for saving the world from communism and for the good economy over the last twenty years because he lowered taxes.


The panel McLeroy headed remains a stacked deck. According the Texas Freedom Network, christianists began a concerted effort to take control of the state board beginning in 1992. Targeting first Democrats and then Republican incumbents, the board's far-right faction has grown in power since that time. In 2006 the faction grew to seven members. Another creationist, Gail Lowe, is now chair.


The TxSBOE lurches from one divisive "culture war" battle to another on issues such as teaching creationism in science classes, abstinence-only policies in sex education, and downplaying or denying the contributions of minorities and different cultures in history.


McLeroy was soundly defeated by a moderate Republican challenger in this, his first attempt to be elected to his appointed position. McLeroy's blind determination to insert "intelligent design" into Texas science textbooks caused the Legislature to refused his reappointment as chair of the board, but he remained a board member. When this term is up, he is out. It is his willful ignorance and blind denial that caused the voters in McLeroy’s district to reject him.


To address McLeroy's assertion that the U.S. is a Christian nation, that myth has been disproved in so many ways only blind denialist can both ignore the evidence and brag about the ignorance. While many of the Founding Fathers were religious, and some were undeniably Christian, the foundation of this nation was not built upon the sands of Christianity. Our founders, having seen firsthand the intolerance and oppression of state-sponsored religion, were determined that ours should be a secular government.


Thomas Jefferson was the author of the Virginia Bill of Religious Freedom, the major author of our Declaration of Independence, and was second only to James Madison in the construction of our Constitution. The verbiage of the First Amendment is nearly verbatim that of the Virginia's Religious Freedom bill. Jefferson’s writings leave no doubt that he was deist in thinking, as were most of our founders, and that he would have little to do with Christianity.


To form his philosophy of religion, Jefferson drew extensively from the ideas of three major enlightenment thinkers: Francis Bacon, John Locke, and Isaac Newton... none of whom were practicing Christians, and Locke was the era's greatest critic of Christianity.


From Bacon, Jefferson learned inductive reasoning to be superior to Aristotelian thinking and deductive reasoning. He learned to rely on personal experience, to base belief upon evidence, to look forward for understanding and not rearward for dogmatic direction.


Locke’s writings taught Jefferson that truth had to be learned through experience and experimentation, that nature loved balance and equality... and that liberty prevailed in the natural world.


Newton’s science and mathmatics demonstrated to Jefferson the idea that the world was orderly, dependable, regular, and predictable... and that by observation man could learn the ways of nature.


The only references to religion in our Constitution are prohibitive. Article 6 states that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust." The First Amendment states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."


The Treaty of Tripoli (Treaty of Tunis), clearly states "the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." This treaty was drafted in 1796, during George Washington's presidency. It was read before the Senate on June 7, 1797, was unanimously approved, even by the Christians of the time.


Once ratified, the treaty was signed by our second President, and arguably one of the more Christian-leaning of our founders, John Adams. In spite of his religious beliefs, Adams recognized the imperative of secular government.


The evidence is clear. The United States is not a Christian nation. It never was, and no amount of creationist revisionism will alter that fact.


The battle over reason, science and fact in Texas schoolbooks is far from over though, as this week the TxSBOE votes on the Social Studies curriculum that will be employed in Texas classroom for the next decade, and the revisionists still maintain a majority.

~~

October 30, 2009

Ray Comfort smackdown

In celebration of the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin's ‘On the Origin of Species’, an evangelical xtian ministry has published a butchered version of the book, inserting a marvelously ridiculous introduction using worn out and debunked creationist garbage, all in an almost laughable attempt to rebut Darwin's theory and make the case for ‘intelligent design’.

Creationist and certifiable lunatic Ray Comfort and his Living Waters ministry plan to distribute tens of thousands of free copies on the nation’s college campuses next month.

Eugenie C. Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education, received an evaluation copy in advance of its release, and does a fine job critiquing the vandalized tome. The NCSE is the leading group promoting and defending the teaching of evolution in public schools. Her remarks are published today in U.S. News & World Report’s online edition. Dr. Scott appears not too worried about the effects, closing her review with these words:

I have faith that college students are sharp enough to realize that Comfort's take on Darwin and evolution is simply bananas.”

Let us hope Dr. Scott is correct in her praise of the average college student. Please find her full article HERE.
~~

July 10, 2009

…an emphatically Christian government

Article 7, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution states:


"A general diffusion of knowledge being essential to the preservation of the liberties and rights of the people, it shall be the duty of the Legislature of the State to establish and make suitable provision for the support and maintenance of an efficient system of public free schools."


Thus we have the Texas State Board of Education, with the constitutional mission of establishing suitable schools for Texas children. Unfortunately, our current Governor, secessionist Rick Perry, has spent the past nine years ensuring that our State Board of Ignorance [HT] meets the lofty, theocratic standards of the Christian Right, and the knowledge diffused to Texas school kids is subjected to a “Biblical litmus test”.

Credit for the title of this post goes to TxSBOE board member Cynthia Nowland Dunbar, a conservative Republican elected from a district that stretches from just outside of Houston all the way up to Austin. The Biblical litmus test quote is hers too. Both come from her book, One Nation Under God: How the Left is Trying to Erase What Made Us Great, in which she argues that our founders created “an emphatically Christian government” and that government should be guided by a “biblical litmus test.” Her book campaigns for a belief system in which “any person desiring to govern have a sincere knowledge and appreciation for the Word of God in order to rightly govern.”

Good stuff, huh? And the book is chock full of entertaining little ditties. For instance, I found it interesting that a Board of Education member would refer to public education as a “subtly deceptive tool of perversion.” Dunbar, who home schooled her own children, calls the establishment of public schools unconstitutional and “tyrannical,” because public schooling threatens the authority of families, granted by God through Scripture, to direct the instruction of their children. All of this is very curious, since the TxSBOE was established under constitutional authority.

The book is not Dunbar’s first literary effort. She has dropped several piles in the past. Last year during the Presidential campaign, she unleashed an online tirade repeating, among other misguided opinions, the stier ausscheidung that Obama was a terrorist sympathizer. Her ignorance and extremism come honestly though. You see, she is a graduate of Pat Robertson’s Regents University law school.

Now, gentle reader, I suspect you are asking why I rant so about this obviously misguided woman and her baffling beliefs. Well… until today she was rumored to be the top candidate to replace Don McLeroy, another extremist whose gubernatorial reappointment to the Chair of the TxSBOE was blocked by the Texas State Senate. After McLeroy was shot down, the pundits predicted Dunbar to be the next duck in the shooting gallery.

Not to worry though, because had Governor Goodhair been so arrogant I’m pretty confident the Senate would have been sensible enough to see through the smoke, and she would have been shot down. Even our normally wingnut legislature would have to wonder how a person who is bent on dismantling our public school system should be allowed to chair the body entrusted with advancing public education. Perry likely doesn’t have the good sense to understand this, so his advisors must have given him a clue.

And thus Perry has appointed Gail Lowe, R-Lampasas. To many, myself included, this will be no better. Lowe is another social conservative right wingnut Christian of the same stripe as Dunbar, but she is on the quiet side and little more than a follower. Honestly, she is a political milksop who will go with the right wingnut flow, following directions like a good little sheep.

Texas is little better with Lowe wearing the badge than if McLeroy had been reconfirmed last year, or Dunbar appointed in his stead. Last September Lowe was marching in lockstep with the Republican theocracy crowd, signing and distributing an email encouraging public schools to use the disputed Bible curriculum in science classes; one which legal experts predicted would land them in court.

"It's absolutely jaw-dropping," said Mark Chancey, a professor of religious studies at Southern Methodist University, speaking of the e-mail circulated by board members Terri Leo, R-Spring, Barbara Cargill, R-The Woodlands, Cynthia Dunbar, R-Richmond, and Gail Lowe, R-Lampasas. "It would be challenging for any school district to teach a Bible course in a way that satisfied all its constituencies, but this particular course is especially troubling.”

Texas is in the same deep doo doo as much of the rest of the country when it comes to this kind of actions. Science is holding on, but only by the sheerest of threads. The Christian right marches on and the forces of ignorance have not rested in their efforts to subjugate the citizens of this country under a Christian theocracy. Their goal is to chain us to Biblical law; science be damned.

The lure of the dark side must be powerful and the mental fog created by the faithful blinding, as electronic communications have made the world a smaller place and knowledge of dreadful acts perpetuated by theocratic dictatorships is forever in our faces. We must wonder how the theocrats fail to see the folly in such ideas. One has only to look at the Islamic theocracies in the Middle East and Africa to understand the danger.

~~

April 21, 2009

Local News with National Impact

Creationist group says state rejection of degree plan violates its civil rights

April 21, 2008. The Dallas Morning News, in the Metro Section, carried this story of what is certain to become a First Amendment case of Supreme Court stature. If it makes it that far.

The Dallas based Institute for Creation Research, which has been offering an unaccredited Master of Science program in Creation Science in San Diego, California for the past 27 years, moved to Dallas in 2006. Approval was required from the state board that approves degree programs for the institute to continue offering the program. The application was denied.

In an April 24 ruling, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board rejected the institute’s degree program because it did not meet state academic standards. The institute, claiming THECB violated its civil rights, has filed a lawsuit [HUGE PDF download, but worth the read]. There is an article on the institute’s web site, in which the author, James J. S. Johnson, J.D., shouts “Censorship!” Personally, I fail to see where censorship would enter into the argument, but Johnson is a regular contributor to the site and makes other weird arguments.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Dallas, alleges that THECB rejected the degree program because of the institute's claim that scientific evidence shows the earth is only 6,000 years old, which is in conflict with accepted science. In papers filed with the court, the institute claims "The monopolistic realities of the science education market in Texas (and in America generally) would limit creationist learners to science education opportunities from evolutionist graduate schools." It further says that the institute is "the only graduate school which specializes in creationism-informed science education."

For its part, THECB is concerned that the proposed master’s program would not properly prepare future classroom teachers to teach established science standards in Texas public-school classrooms. The board would not comment further, stating that the case is under litigation.

The Institute for Creation Research was formed in 1970 by the late Henry M. Morris, a Dallasite known as the father of creation science. Religionists claim creation science as a theory that centers on a philosophy in which science and religion both indicate that the Earth and all living things were created by an intelligent being. The Morris biography is one of an individual intent upon finding biblical justification for everything in nature, and either ignoring anything which did not agree with his preconceived ideas, or creating more myth as explanation.

It is good that the board, consisting of educators and scientists, has declined the application, but the THECB may be out-maneuvered and the lawsuit become moot. Creationists members of the Texas Legislature are making an end run in an effort to aid the institute’s efforts. Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, has introduced a bill [HB-2800, PDF download] that would exempt the institute from state rules that accredited, degree-granting universities must follow.

So here we have another effort, in the never-ending onslaught on reason, by religionists to force their supernatural worldview on the citizens of Texas. If the Berman bill passes muster, or if the lawsuit makes it to the Roberts’s court, the result is likely to be a degradation of educational standards in Texas classrooms. With Texas being among the top three purchasers of textbooks of any state, this will not bode well for the rest of the nation.

~~



UPDATE: I should have checked before I posted, but I did not. There are other, more eloquent pundits, blogging on this story. Please view the following:



Timothy Sandefur's Freespace (this is really good, and you really should read it)

The Dallas Observer



Skepacabra, which offers other interesting links



~~

April 1, 2009

Texas Poised to Overtake Tennessee

Please watch the following videos. The first is Texas State Board of Education Chairman, Don McLeroy (whom I have blogged about before) as he attempts to justify the dogged determination of the creationists on the SBOE to inject mythology into Texas science classes. This rant follows on the heels of a guest OpEd piece McLeroy wrote for the Austin American Statesman.



Taking into account that McLeroy is a dentist and is very likely not well schooled in the biological sciences, and taking into account McLeroy’s avowed creationist bent, I find his editorial to be very weak even before we dissect his “facts.” But for the sake of accuracy, let’s dissect those facts.

McLeroy either grossly misunderstands the science he quotes, or is deliberately obfuscating the science. What McLeroy does such a bad job of is understanding punctuated equilibria. This is the theory Stephen Jay Gould referred to in the paper from which McLeroy quotes. The theory states that most species experience negligible change for the largest portion of their history, which is revealed as stasis in the fossil record. But Gould goes on to state that when the kind of phenotypic evolution McLeroy admits does occur, it is geologically localized and occurring in sporadic, branching events.

The fossil record indicates that a species generally survives somewhere around 5-10 million years and that they change very little in that time period. This is Gould’s "stasis." That McLeroy so badly misunderstands. Evolution occurred in spits and spurts separated by millions of years of punctuated equilibria.

McLeroy’s rant is no threat to the theory of evolution, but his actions and those of half of the appointed (by Rick Perry, which is another story altogether) SBOE, added to the fact that the 2nd largest purchaser of textbooks in the country will now demand books supporting myth over science, and you have a situation which could possibly affect even those not in Texas. This is very troublesome.

Now follows a bit of explanation how Texas science books will become the laughing stock of the scientific world, even though the SBOE hired a board of experts to aid in writing the standards. This is biology Professor David Hillis from the University of Texas. Professor Hillis was one of the panel of experts who helped write the initial standards.



So McLeroy’s quote mining can be dismissed, as it becomes painfully apparent that his goal is not teaching our kids science, but propping up his creationist views. If this standard had been in effect when I was in school I could have aced all those science quizzes. The answer to every question would have been “God did it!”

The die may be cast, but the battle is far from over. For much more information and some interesting links, please visit the Texas Citizens for Science website.


~~

February 19, 2009

Evolution vs. The New Academic Freedom

The numbers of Americans who believe human beings were created in our present form ranges somewhere north of 40%, according to several recent Gallup and the Pew polls. What does this say for the state of science in America? It doesn’t bode well, that much is certain.

The problem rears an ugly head with politicians, egged on by wingnut constituents, attempting to legislate Darwin out and help Jesus get a toe in the classroom door. Educators don’t like this very much, and thankfully neither do judges. As a result the theory of evolution remains dominant in almost all current public school science curricula. However, Darwin’s opponents have tried some impressively interesting challenges in the decades since Scopes.

One battle was recently lost, and until the Supremes step in this is problematic. In June of 2008, with the support of Republican Governor Bobby Jindal, the Louisiana legislature passed the Science Education act. This is the first to pass of the so-called “academic freedom" laws. Previously all of the evolution battles were on the local level, but these academic freedom initiatives are aimed at a state legislative level. This is a whole new tactic in the never-ending siege on science by the vandals of myth.

This particular genre of laws is subtle. They do not make direct assaults with thinly veiled “alternative theories”, but instead force the state to support a teacher’s “right” to discuss the “strengths and scientific weaknesses" mumbo jumbo supported by the Christian purveyors of ID. Once such a law is passed, a teacher may introduce almost any supplemental classroom material desired.

Because of the success of the Louisiana bill, Alabama, Iowa, and New Mexico legislatures are now entertaining similar attempts. Legislation was introduced but defeated in Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas.

All of this is likely rooted in the Seattle-based Discovery Institute, which has long been a fountain of supernatural misinformation and an advocate of teaching ID (intelligent design) as an alternative to evolution. ID advocates claim that “life is too complex to have simply evolved without the hand of an intelligent designer” Right. This is the same garbage that a federal court in Pennsylvania rejected in 2005, just repackaged and with the name changed. It was originally called “creation science.” The “supplemental material” suggested is the same as pre-2005 as well, with a few words changed.

The 2005 decision has served only to slow the mythologists. These academic freedom initiatives are determined, creative, and deceptive. Because of this they are proving difficult to battle, as was shown in both the Texas and Oklahoma legislative votes. In both cases, reason prevailed by only a single vote.

~~

February 18, 2009

Darwin was Wrong!

The Angle of the Vagina Disproves the Theory of Evolution
.
And I thought the Creation Evidence Museum in Glen Rose, Texas was the final word. This fellow in Britain has it all worked out.
.
Uproariously funny!
~~

January 2, 2009

More evidence for evolution of species?

In a former life, the young lady in the video served as a paramedic on the Texas frontier. Her new job is with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection service. The critter is a previously undiscovered specie.


~~

December 13, 2008

Flat Earth 101


I’d like to introduce you to a fellow I find very entertaining. His name is Pascal Boyer, a professor of Anthropology and Psychology at Washington University in St. Louis, who holds the prestigious title of Henry Luce Professor of Individual and Collective Memory.

Boyer is also a religious philosopher and the author of a book I enjoyed, titled Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Foundations of Religious Belief, published by Random House (UK) and Basic Books (USA), 2001. The main theme of this book is that we now have a better understanding of religious representations, their causes and their role in human cognition, simply because we have a better and more precise understanding of the mind-brain, its evolution, its structure and its specific dispositions.

From the book:
“…coalitional psychology is involved in the dynamics of public religious commitment. When people proclaim their adherence to a particular faith, they subscribe to claims for which there is no evidence, and that would be taken as obviously wrong or ridiculous in other religious groups. This signals a willingness to embrace the group’s particular norm for no other reason that that it is, precisely, the group’s norm.”


Professor Boyer strikes a resonate chord in this statement, and it may explain some of the irrational behavior I’ve witnessed here in Texas recently.

The October 16th Dallas Morning News reported the following:

“Social conservatives on the State Board of Education have appointed three evolution critics to a six-member committee that will review proposed curriculum standards for science courses in Texas schools. Two of the appointees are authors of a book that questions many of the tenets of Charles Darwin's theory of how humans and other life forms evolved. One of them, Stephen Meyer, is also vice president of the Discovery Institute, a Seattle-based group that promotes an explanation of the origin of life similar to creationism.” The other author is Ralph Seelke, a biology professor at the University of Wisconsin-Superior. Also on the panel is Baylor University chemistry professor Charles Garner, who, like the other two, signed the Discovery Institute's "Dissent from Darwinism" statement that sharply questions key aspects of the theory of evolution. "


The "Dissent from Darwinism" document states:


"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."


So, we in Texas get to look forward to anti-evolutionists (flat-earthers) developing the science curriculum that will be taught to school children in our state. Lovely.





~~



~~