January 30, 2014
Willful Ignorance
August 24, 2012
Debunking historical revisionism
David Barton's Make-Believe Version of American History
Despite the fact that he has no academic training in history or related fields at all, Barton has become the go-to man for much of the religious far right.
January 24, 2012
Tea Bag Obfuscation
"The late comedian George Carlin used to say America was built on a double standard: 'This country was founded by slave owners who wanted to be free.”
So observes Wall Street Journal writer Sam Favate in his piece Tennessee Tea Party Wants Schools to Be Nicer to Founding Fathers.
“Neglect and outright ill will have distorted the teaching of the history and character of the United States. We seek to compel the teaching of students in Tennessee the truth regarding the history of our nation and the nature of its government.”
So say the right wing activists pushing this change in textbook standards. Opponents to this silly revision correctly observe that this is simply an effort to veil the truth. In other words... another wingnut effort to indoctrinate the children with revisionist history.
March 29, 2011
Why America is no longer exceptional
“81 percent of seniors from our top fifty-five colleges and universities failed a test of basic U.S. history questions drawn from a national exam designed for high school seniors. Only 22 percent knew, for example, that the words “government of the people, by the people, for the people” came from Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. If most American youngsters don’t learn about their nation’s history in the K-12 years, they are unlikely ever to learn about it.”
December 6, 2010
Religious Right Refudiated
![]() |
| Adullam Films |
The film trailer is on YouTube.
September 19, 2010
The Tea Party: Not just for breakfast anymore
“Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”
May 21, 2010
Will it hold up to a SCOTUS review?
‘Christian Land Governed by Christian Principles’
Even before the Texas State Board of Education took up its expected debate today over what students will learn about separation about church and state in their social studies classrooms, board member Cynthia Dunbar, R-Richmond, made her position clear. She offered the board’s opening prayer this morning and removed any doubt about what she and other far-right board members want students to learn: America’s laws and government should be based on the Christian Bible.
Stop what you are doing and watch this video now -- you have to see it to believe it.
Laying out in blunt language the “Christian nation” vision of American history that the board’s powerful bloc of social conservatives espouses, Dunbar threw down the gauntlet:
“I believe no one can read the history of our country without realizing that the Good Book and the spirit of the savior have from the beginning been our guiding geniuses.”
“Whether we look to the first charter of Virginia, or the charter of New England…the same objective is present — a Christian land governed by Christian principles.”
“I like to believe we are living today in the spirit of the Christian religion. I like also to believe that as long as we do so, no great harm can come to our country.”You will recall that Dunbar, in her 2008 book, One Nation Under God, argued that the Founders created “an emphatically Christian government” (page 18 of her book) and that government should be guided by a “biblical litmus test” (page 47). Even more damning, this State Board of Education member wrote that public education is a “subtly deceptive tool of perversion,” tyrannical and unconstitutional.
And today she will help decide what the next generation of Texas students will learn about separation of church and state in their public school classrooms.
You can follow the conclusion to this embarrassing saga on our liveblog at TFNInsider.org. And look for an e-mail later today with the final decision of the board -- and what we can do now to restore sanity and respectability to Texas education.
It's important that all Texans see how bad things have gotten at the state board. Forward this e-mail to friends and post this clip to your Facebook page.
Texas Freedom Network advances a mainstream agenda of religious freedom and individual liberties to counter the radical right.
Make a donation to support the work of TFN.
Tell a friend to subscribe to TFN News Clips, Alerts or Rapid Response Teams. Subscribers may choose the issue areas that interest them.
The five creationist extremists on the SBOE are of the same mindset as Mohammed Atta; just a different theology.
April 23, 2010
Texas Governor's Race
March 8, 2010
Evolution is hooey…
So quoth James McLeroy, the now lame duck member and former Chair of the Texas State Board of Education. McLeroy has led the charge to insert revisionist history and denialist science into Texas school textbooks since appointed to his position in September 2008, by our revisionist, secessionist, religionist governor, Rick Perry.
In an interview with Mariah Blake, writing for Washington Monthly, McLeroy spoke of the way he evaluates textbooks, saying “The secular humanists may argue that we are a secular nation, but we are a Christian nation founded on Christian principles… The way I evaluate history textbooks is first I see how they cover Christianity and Israel. Then I see how they treat Ronald Reagan—he needs to get credit for saving the world from communism and for the good economy over the last twenty years because he lowered taxes.”
The panel McLeroy headed remains a stacked deck. According the Texas Freedom Network, christianists began a concerted effort to take control of the state board beginning in 1992. Targeting first Democrats and then Republican incumbents, the board's far-right faction has grown in power since that time. In 2006 the faction grew to seven members. Another creationist, Gail Lowe, is now chair.
The TxSBOE lurches from one divisive "culture war" battle to another on issues such as teaching creationism in science classes, abstinence-only policies in sex education, and downplaying or denying the contributions of minorities and different cultures in history.
McLeroy was soundly defeated by a moderate Republican challenger in this, his first attempt to be elected to his appointed position. McLeroy's blind determination to insert "intelligent design" into Texas science textbooks caused the Legislature to refused his reappointment as chair of the board, but he remained a board member. When this term is up, he is out. It is his willful ignorance and blind denial that caused the voters in McLeroy’s district to reject him.
To address McLeroy's assertion that the U.S. is a Christian nation, that myth has been disproved in so many ways only blind denialist can both ignore the evidence and brag about the ignorance. While many of the Founding Fathers were religious, and some were undeniably Christian, the foundation of this nation was not built upon the sands of Christianity. Our founders, having seen firsthand the intolerance and oppression of state-sponsored religion, were determined that ours should be a secular government.
Thomas Jefferson was the author of the Virginia Bill of Religious Freedom, the major author of our Declaration of Independence, and was second only to James Madison in the construction of our Constitution. The verbiage of the First Amendment is nearly verbatim that of the Virginia's Religious Freedom bill. Jefferson’s writings leave no doubt that he was deist in thinking, as were most of our founders, and that he would have little to do with Christianity.
To form his philosophy of religion, Jefferson drew extensively from the ideas of three major enlightenment thinkers: Francis Bacon, John Locke, and Isaac Newton... none of whom were practicing Christians, and Locke was the era's greatest critic of Christianity.
From Bacon, Jefferson learned inductive reasoning to be superior to Aristotelian thinking and deductive reasoning. He learned to rely on personal experience, to base belief upon evidence, to look forward for understanding and not rearward for dogmatic direction.
Locke’s writings taught Jefferson that truth had to be learned through experience and experimentation, that nature loved balance and equality... and that liberty prevailed in the natural world.
Newton’s science and mathmatics demonstrated to Jefferson the idea that the world was orderly, dependable, regular, and predictable... and that by observation man could learn the ways of nature.
The only references to religion in our Constitution are prohibitive. Article 6 states that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust." The First Amendment states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
The Treaty of Tripoli (Treaty of Tunis), clearly states "the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." This treaty was drafted in 1796, during George Washington's presidency. It was read before the Senate on June 7, 1797, was unanimously approved, even by the Christians of the time.
Once ratified, the treaty was signed by our second President, and arguably one of the more Christian-leaning of our founders, John Adams. In spite of his religious beliefs, Adams recognized the imperative of secular government.
The evidence is clear. The United States is not a Christian nation. It never was, and no amount of creationist revisionism will alter that fact.
The battle over reason, science and fact in Texas schoolbooks is far from over though, as this week the TxSBOE votes on the Social Studies curriculum that will be employed in Texas classroom for the next decade, and the revisionists still maintain a majority.
~~
February 24, 2010
Revisionism
Myself? I mostly like Bob Ray. He gets a bit out on the limb at times in his commentary on racial issues, but certainly he is no Al Sharpton. When Bob Ray goes down that tired, old trail... I turn the page and move on. On many other social issues, Bob Ray is a frequent home run hitter.
His piece this morning is titled, When religious zeal displaces the truth in history books, and the topic is one to which I pay rather close attention; Revisionist history, or the attempts of true believers to change the history and science books to suit a political or philosophical end. Unfortunately, the efforts to do just that come far too frequently and are frequently all too successful. The result is someone like Bob Ray illustrates in his column.
Bob Ray relates the details of his morning commute, including the spinning of the radio dial to find something of interest. The morning of which he writes, Bob Ray tuned to a popular right-wing call-in talk show, aired daily on Fort Worth’s legendary WBAP radio. The show host, Mark Davis, is a regional favorite and although I seldom agree with his too-far right views, I still tune in and listen from time to time.
I wasn’t listening the morning Bob Ray describes, but I wish I was. Davis, it seems, spoke regarding Buddhism, commenting that the Buddhist belief was older than Christianity.
One of Davis’ listeners apparently took exception, insisting Davis was wrong… that there was no religion older than Christianity. Davis apparently attempted to reason with the caller, explaining that Buddhism has roots predating the birth of Jesus by maybe 600 years. Nothing worked on the caller, who insisted that the God of creation was the Christian god, and that no religion predated creation.
Bob Ray makes it clear that he too is Christian, but then goes on to wonder from whence comes the disrespect of other people’s beliefs?
"I often wonder what makes religious people, especially Christians, so arrogant and, frankly, so bigoted.”
Yeah, I’ve wondered that too, Bob Ray. Christians, throughout history, have sought to steamroll anyone or any group whom they could not “save.” The result has been untold suffering, and even the retardation of medicine and science. For a religion that is supposed to be good and loving, they sure are capable of a bunch of evil and hatred.
"Besides, as I've said many times before, most of the world's great religions teach that you serve God by serving humanity. Certainly many of the principles of Buddhism -- seeking wisdom, respecting others and leading a moral life -- are found in many different faiths, whether that religion is based on a belief in a Godhead or not.”
Christianity teaches that too, Bob Ray, but for some reason Christians fail to practice it. Mohandas Gandhi, when asked about Christianity, famously stated, “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”
Indeed Christianity seems to have a problem when it comes to reason and rationality, but Christianity is not alone in that respect. All religions seem to be based on a foundation of “we were the first… we are the chosen… we are the best… our god can beat up your god…”
This is evident even in the early teachings of the Native American tribal spiritual beliefs. The name by which every tribe called themselves translated to some version or another of “the people,” or “the humans.” All others are damned.
Bob Ray says it well:
“That's just the way it is with some folks: If you don't believe what I believe, Christian or not, hell is definitely reserved for you.”
Bob Ray’s opinion piece is on the mark in many ways, but even he misses what is arguably the real error in thought process seen in this discussion.
Not all Buddhists are atheists, but many are. There are Buddhists who believe in a god, and those beliefs may parallel the practice of Buddhism… compliment it, perhaps… but there are no Buddhist teachings incorporating a deity. Most Buddhists will tell you they simply don’t know if there is a god or not, but they do know there was a Buddha.
Buddhism has no place in an on-air debate about religions. Buddhists don't have a dog in that hunt. The reason it was mentioned, first by the host and then by the caller, is that modern Christians are taught that Buddhism is a pagan religious practice, and therefore is a thing to be rejected and reviled. Buddhists, like all pagans, are going to hell.
Revisionism at its finest.
~~


