Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio) calls the recently passed healthcare reform bill “
the most unconstitutional thing I have ever seen.”
Really? The
most unconstitutional you have
ever seen? Either you have a short memory or you are fond of rose colored shades, Mr. Boehner.
Congress has done far worse. For reference I would point to HR 3172, enacted by the 107th Congress on September 19, 2001, signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The Patriot Act was a true bipartisan effort, with the House voting 357-66 in favor of the measure, and 98-1 in the Senate.
The USA Patriot Act of 2001, a contrived acronym for “
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorists,” is the most blatantly unconstitutional legislation to stumble through Congress since the Alien and Sedition acts of 1789. Before recent revisions, the Patriot Act violated Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution by suspending the
Habeas Corpus and
Bill of Attainder provisions, and it all but vacated the protections of the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth amendments.
Eight years have passed since Patriot became law. Stories of abuse still surface in tales of government lies and extravagances, with U.S. citizens delivered into a byzantine morass of legal entanglement on flimsy, sometimes contrived evidence. Reading the stories and listening to the court cases makes one think of the old Soviet Union.
As an example, take the sad case of Brandon Mayfield, an attorney and citizen of the U.S.A. Mayfield was jailed and held in federal lockup for 19 days… as a
material witness against himself. His house was searched and bugged, computer files (even those pertaining to clients, which violated attorney client privilege) were downloaded and seized, and the children’s homework copied. It was Mayfield’s daughter’s Spanish homework, combined with a misidentified fingerprint, which convinced the FBI that Mayfield was involved in the March 2004 Madrid train bombings.
When the FBI’s “
evidence” was finally presented to a judge, the case was tossed on its ear. The FBI had utilized the now infamous Section 215 to make unlawful entry into the Mayfield home, plant listening devices, download computer files, and seize evidence to support what
turned out to be a bogus charge that even the Spanish authorities scoffed at.
Section 215 grants the FBI the power to seize a vast array of sensitive personal information and belongings, including medical, library and business records, using a secret intelligence court that does not require any suspicion of individual criminal activity. Although a court order is required to obtain these records, judges are compelled to issue them, making judicial review in this process nothing more than a rubber stamp.
Patriot amended 15 different federal laws, including the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, the
Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA)of 1986, the
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the
Family Education Rights and Privacy Act. The act authorized roving wiretaps and the so-called “
sneak and peek” warrants, obliterated the wall between foreign and domestic intelligence, and amended the definition of domestic terrorism.
Robert Levy, senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute,
has written that the Patriot Act represents "
the looming sacrifice of civil liberties at the altar of national security." The Mayfield family learned the truth of this all too well, and their case is but one of hundreds.
You want unconstitutional? Look no further than the truly bipartisan Patriot Act. The healthcare boondoggle doesn’t hold a candle to that. Mr. Boehner’s pomposity is nothing more than clownish, but standard right wing fare. The Democrats have behaved similarly in the past, so I don’t pretend to give them a pass, but this crop of Republicans is definitely pushing the limits of the legitimate.
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, writing in his dissent in
Olmstead v. United States (1928), said it best. “
Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”
I’m old enough to remember a time when all of the Congress didn’t suck all of the time, and there were at least a few rational members on both sides of the aisle. Those days, it seems, are long gone.
~~
For further reading, try
Section 505 and the National Security Letter and the related cases,
Doe v. Ashcroft (2004) and
Doe v. Gonzales (2005). Other Patriot related cases include
Muslim Community Association of Ann Arbor v. Ashcroft (2006),
Humanitarian Law Project v. Ashcroft and the associated
Humanitarian Law Project v. Reno, which was an earlier challenge to Bill Clinton’s
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty (AEDPA) Act.
~~