Showing posts sorted by relevance for query bachmann. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query bachmann. Sort by date Show all posts

February 20, 2009

End Times Prophecy, Meet Neo-McCarthyism

In past posts to this blog I’ve briefly examined our constitution and the first five amendments. I’ve posited that the first and second were possibly in priority order, with the freedom of expression, a free and vital press, and religious freedoms to be primary in the eyes of our founders, with an armed citizenry in place to protect these liberties. In subsequent posts (here, here, here and here) I blogged about actual or potential infringements of the first and second amendment. Some of the potentials I described are subtle, as in the Third Wave/Sarah Palin piece describes.

Today I’d like to point to what happens when we are deluded into letting our guard down and accepting a wolf in sheep’s clothing into our fold.

Beware the Wolf

The religious right comes to us wrapped up in the guise of “family values.” They champion the fact that they have it and, by implication, that the Democrats don’t. Even on the surface that is absurd, but, if 10 years of Republican controlled congress and eight years in the White House tell the real story, it must be what the people believe. I find it difficult to blame Jane Q. Citizen for wanting a government based on traditional values. The problem comes in how we describe these values. A voter from rural Nebraska will obviously have different values than one from Manhattan. Voting patterns indicate that rural folk lean to a more conservative candidate, while voters from more densely populated regions tend to be more liberal.

So, what happens when there comes a candidate running for a national office with a voter base in a mostly rural area of Minnesota? She professes deep religious (Christian, of course) beliefs, has previously championed religious causes, and has become the darling of the right wing conservative movement.. She even graduated from Bob Jones University. What happens? You get Michele Marie Bachmann elected to be the Republican Representative of Minnesota's 6th congressional district.

So where is the real problem in this? Many of similar stripe have come before, and the district is pretty hardcore Republican, so it seems appropriate that Bachmann would be a good fit. The problem is that the voters were fooled by a wolf in disguise. Many eventually recognized this, but it was too little, too late.

Although it seemed likely that she had torpedoed her own reelection hopes, Bachmann defeated Democratic Elwyn Tinklenberg in the 2008 election. This election gained national attention following a television interview in which she called on the media to investigate unnamed members of Congress for anti-American activities. She made a special inclusion of then Senator Barack Obama.

More Iceberg Exposed

Bachmann’s history includes some very interesting clues to what we now find in the Minnesota 6th District office. In 1993, along with some other parents, Bachmann helped open New Heights, a K – 12 Charter school in Stillwater, MN. Theschool quickly ran into trouble with both state and federal law. Minnesota charter schools receive funding from the state and operate as tax exempt 501c3 non-profit agencies. Oversight is by the local school district. The problems started when a group of parents went to the school board complaining about the school’s leadership. The school’s board of directors, of which Bachmann was a member, was illegally attempting to insert Christianity into the curriculum. Creationism was being taught and the theory of evolution was all but banned. The confrontation eventually led Bachmann and four other board members to resigning.

In 1998 Bachmann was again in the spotlight. She was gaining favor with the Christian right by her opposition to the Minnesota "Profile of Learning", which was intended to raise the state’s standard for high schools. Bachmann’s position on these new standards were in line with the Maple River Education Coalition (now called EdWatch) and the Minnesota Family Institute, both Christian based political organizations.

Creationism Morphs to Intelligent Design

Bachmann had foster children living under her care. In 1996, while here biological children attended the charter school she founded, these children were attending public schools in the same school district. Bachmann wanted the same Christian curriculum taught in the public schools as she had attempted to slip into the charter school, so she started and spearheaded an effort to have intelligent design taught alongside the scientific theory of evolution in science classes. The effort failed.

A couple years later Bachmann ran for a seat on the Stillwater school board. Revisionist historians would be proud of the way she denied having ever attempted injecting her religion into the classroom.

Faggots Beware!

Over the next several years Bachmann ran for and was elected to a variety of state offices, including State Senator. While serving in that office she organized and appeared at various public rallies for an assortment of socially conservative causes. She soon established herself as a true ally of the religious right. At an October 2003 “Ten Commandments Rally,” broadcast on the local Christian radio station, Bachmann called for a return to “biblical and Christian” values. She went so far as to call for the posting of the Ten Commandments in classrooms and in public buildings.

The next month, Bachmann proposed a constitutional amendment, co-authored with Representative Mary Holberg, to ban same-sex marriage. The amendment was opposed by members of the Minnesota Democrat Farmer Labor party. In March of 2004, along with a coalition of religious leaders, Bachmann promoted a rally in support of the bill on the steps of the statehouse. About 3,000 people attended. At this rally the 35 DFL opponents of the amendment were demonized and threatened. Rally participants received maps of the Capitol with these senator’s offices marked. Rally organizers urged their flock to go forth and flood the offices of the heathens. Good Christians, eh?

Bachmann’s insistent demands for a vote on the amendment were fought by the DFL with equal resolve. The ensuing floor battles completely stalled the 2004 session to the point that no other legislation could survive. Even the budget measure failed to make it to the floor. Banning gay marriage, it appears, was more important to this woman than the fiscal survival of her state.

In the end reason prevailed and the effort failed. In 2004, at least, the same-sex marriage prohibition would not see daylight. Not to be denied, Bachmann brought it up again in the 2005 session. By this time she had been appointed head of policy for the Senate Republican Caucus, chaired by Dick Day. She was being groomed to run for the 6th district congressional seat. Even though it again failed, she organized another demonstration at the statehouse, with speaking guest Governor Tom Pawlenty and Tony Perkins, of the Family Research Council. Minority Leader Day fired Bachmann three months later, citing “philosophical reasons”.

Ms. Bachmann Goes to Washington

It was only a few months later when the 6th District congressman, Mark Kennedy, announced he would run for a Senate seat, and Bachmann threw her hat in the ring for the seat Kennedy would vacate. Hew stature in Washington was immediately apparent, as one Republican dignitary after another came to Minnesota to stump and help raise funds for her campaign. Dennis Hastert, then Speaker of the House, Presidential Chief of Staff Karl Rove, VP Dick Cheeny and even the Shrub himself visited Minnesota. It is notable that most of Bachmann’s in-state funding came by donations from contributors outside her district, and that none of the Washington VIP’s ever visited the 6th District.

In a previous piece I talked of the National Republican Congressional Committee’s (NRCC) involvement in dirty tricks by using a phone bank to make dummy calls. Well, about the time all that was happening the RNCC was funneling something close to $3 million into an electronic and direct-mail dirty tricks campaign targeted against Bachmann’s Democratic opponent, Patty Wetterling. Even with this cash injection and the VIP fundraising tour, Wetterling raised more than Bachmann by about double.

Then came the November 2005 debate in which Bachmann first showed her true self in a public, videotaped, irrefutable format. "There is a movement afoot that's occurring and part of that is whole philosophical idea of multicultural diversity, which on the face sounds wonderful. Let's appreciate and value everyone's cultures. But guess what? Not all cultures are equal. Not all values are equal." See the video.



Christians Roll out the Big Guns

The evangelicals badly wanted a win for Bachmann, so they hitched up the big horses. James Dodson’s group, Focus on the Family, spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on the campaign (NOTE: Dobson has found a new favorite wingnut in Minnesota politics). A more local church, pastored by Mac Hammond, has found itself in deep doo doo for contributing to the Bachmann campaign. Bachmann spoke at Hammond’s Living Word Christian Center, stating in part, “You are now looking at a fool for Christ. This is a fool for Christ.”

This must have been what the Minnesota voters want to hear, because Bachmann went on to win the election, and was reelected in 2008, in spite of several verbal blunders.

Joe McCarthy in Lipstick

Incumbents have a real edge and almost always win. Thus when Democrat Elwyn Tinklenberg tossed his hat in the ring almost nobody gave him much hope. Democrats thought they might have a chance based upon Tinklenberg's credentials. He had held a statewide office as Transportation Commissioner, and was a former Methodist minister. In October 2008, Bachmann gave Tinklenberg some much needed ammunition.

In a Friday, October 17 2008 televised interview with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, Bachmann makes statements that raise the specter of the long deceased House Un-American Activities Committee, and the Senate’s own Joe McCarthy.

Among other rather reactionary comments, Bachmann questions then Presidential candidate Obama’s patriotism, calling him and his wife Michelle, “un-American.” See the full video here.





Even though the Tinklenberg campaign’s phone rang off the hook in reaction to the interview, and donations poured in over the next several days, Bachmann won reelection.

Now it is February 2009 and we have a new President. Bachmann apparently didn't learn much from the Hardball debacle, even though she has since called it a "big mistake" and has all but stopped talking to the mainstream media, but that hasn't stopped her from putting her foot in her mouth. In the clip below we hear her on Chris Baker's KTLK conservative talk show spouting off about the recently passed stimulus package.

As has been the case with much of her political career, this is more of Bachmann's fact-free ranting. This may be the kind of representation rural Minnesota wants, but for some reason I have a tough time swallowing it.

However, there is a movement afoot to draft a Bachmann-Palin ticket for 2012. Wouldn't that be interesting?

~~

April 4, 2009

In Truth We Trust

Tuesday a week ago, on FOX Business, Anchor Liz Claman interviewed one of my current favorite forked-tongue and sneak-Christ-in-the-back-door politicians, Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann. Claman spent time asking questions about the stimulus bill. Bachmann, like many before her, railed against all the earmarks.

“I took a pledge in my own district. I have not taken earmarks in the last three years that I have been in Congress because the system is so corrupt. It’s possible to make that pledge.” Says Bachmann, and indeed you can find Bachmann’s name among those “brave members who have personally decided to stop receiving pork projects” as one of the members of the Club for Growth, along with club founder Jeff Flake, House Minority Leader John Boehner, and 2008 Presidential candidate John McCain.

You may watch the FOX interview here:







Apparently Bachmann had her fingers crossed, because in FY08 she requested a total of seven earmarks totaling $3,767,600. In other words, Bachmann lied, and in a repeat performance of this pledge the next year, she opted out and did not sign.

Bachmann must think her constituents don't read the news... and perhaps she is correct.

Tug-of-War

The political and cultural wars have taken a toll on our society, with truth and honesty being the greatest casualty. The fringes of both wings resort to any tactic in an effort to win. There is some unreasonable fear for the future of our country if one side manages to dominate. Neither side trusts the other to be truthful and reasonable, and tempers flare for no apparent reason.

Our nation is made up from individuals with varying degrees of political polarization. The myth of a political or curtural war in which one side must dominate and the other be dominated is only an excuse for shrill political pundits to rally the faithful on some concocted battle ground.

Society will not display any noticible changes over short periods of time. Our culture is far too rigid for that. Instead we change slowly, constantly over the course of time. No side will ever win an imaginary war created in the minds of political reactionaries by fighting short-term battles.

Our current political culture seems to place no value on truth. This is made apparent by such inconsistency as we find with Michele Bachman. I pick on her because I dislike her sneaky attempts to insert religion into government, but I could just as easily pick on most any other politician, regardless of party affiliation. Take for instance Republican/Libertarian Ron Paul. One would think if any politician would shun earmarks Mr. Paul would be the one. But obviously not.






So the characteristic that we should find most valuable in an elected member of Congress is absent from even the most conservative and overtly Christian members of that Most August Body. Instead of ethics we find lies, mental gymnastics and revisionist history. I often pick on the Republicans, but this is true of both sides of the isle, and of the White House.

Perhaps truth is not lost

I keep thinking the American people will figure this out, and perhaps now is the most promising time in history for that awakening. Every day there is some new technological means to hear the news, and to vet it for truth. In this respect my friend TOTTYTR is very correct.

We are no longer yoked to a single print newspaper and two or three network news shows. If we want we can listen to all sides of an issue from dozens of angles, and even dig in to the statistical facts by mining the wealth of the Internet. When a politician says one thing and does another, we can learn about it and not be dependent on limited and possibly biased news sources.

If we want, we can scroll back in history and find that the tech bubble burst within a couple months after the Shrub took office, and that the likes of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh rushed to his defense; blaming the stock market crash on Bill Clinton. And now that these two wingnut pundits are blaming the current recession on Barack Obama, we can call it the bullshit that it is.

Teach your children well


~~

March 27, 2009

Loverly Bunch of Coconuts


Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) is at it again. As I’ve pointed out before, this lady is a few French fries short of a happy meal. And in Glenn Beck, who I have also found reason to ridicule, she has an enabler in her most recent whacky quest.



Bachmann, following some comments made earlier this week by the Governor of China’s Central Bank, began spouting off about some global conspiracy that the world was bound for ruin and heading toward establishing a global currency, and that the U.S. would join in the move as early as the G-20 conference next week. China’s suggestion of replacing the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency contained no language about Bachmann’s feared “unified global currency”, but that didn’t stop her from running off at the mouth yet again.



Beck is right about one thing; most Americans have no idea what Bachmann is talking about, but then neither does she.

Most countries hold financial reserves in various foreign currencies, or in gold, and right now a majority of countries hold mostly U.S. dollars. This is not exclusive, as Euros Yen and British Pounds are also popular. Our treasury does not hold our own dollars in reserve, but we do keep a bit of gold.

What the Chinese were referencing is that our currency the de facto global reserve currency, but the International Monetary Fund also issues International Reserve Assets, called Special Drawing Rights (SDR), which governments may use instead. The Chinese suggested that the world move away from dollars. The use of SDR’s, they suggested, would be more balanced and less vulnerable to changing U.S. policies.

How Bachmann made the leap from a mere banking policy suggestion to some global conspiracy is beyond me, and why Glenn Beck would find any value in enabling a kook defies reason. I thought Beck was crazy when he was with CNN, and the move to FOX only deepened his bizarre behavior. As for Bachmann, she should stick to more substantial issues, like Freedom of Choice for light bulbs.

~~

May 15, 2011

Verbatim

From CityPages.com, the Minneapolis/St. Paul alternative newspaper... now online.

Is Michele Bachmann smarter than a high school sophomore?
By Nick Pinto, Thu., May 12 2011

Nick writes...

Michele Bachmann is famously reluctant to put herself in positions where she might have to talk to someone who disagrees with her.

But Jesus God do we hope she makes an exception in this instance.

Amy Myers, a high school sophomore from Cherry Hill, New Jersey, has thrown down the gauntlet, challenging the Minnesota Representative to a debate and public test on the constitution, U.S. history, and civics.

From Amy's letter to Michelle Bachmann...

Rep. Bachmann, the frequent inability you have shown to accurately and factually present even the most basic information about the United States led me to submit the follow challenge, pitting my public education against your advanced legal education:

I, Amy Myers, do hereby challenge Representative Michele Bachmann to a Public Forum Debate and/or Fact Test on The Constitution of the United States, United States History and United States Civics.

It is so very interesting that a Minneapolis public school sophomore would feel confident enough to challenge a Congressperson to a civics debate.

...but do you suppose there is a chance in hell it will happen?

Read the rest of the blog, and Amy's letter.
###

April 27, 2009

Wingnuts in Love

Right wing blogger Pamela Geller [Atlas Shrugs] has offered up some really bizarre stuff over the years, and on April 1st, 2009, Geller did it again. In an interview [20 minutes long] with Winger-in-Chief, Michelle Bachman (whom I have written about before), Geller just cannot seem to gush sufficiently in her praise of the Michigan Republican… and Bachmann’s revolutionary, anti-Obama ranting just gets nuttier. Geller’s choice of dates to post this interview seems most appropriate.

What would y’all think of a Palin / Bachmann ticket in 2012?

~~

June 27, 2009

Giving Michelle Bachmann a break

More proof that it is all the fault of the queer's ...

Sally Kern gives Michelle Bachmann a run for her money when it comes to wingnutia. You really must read her proclamation [PDF].

~~

January 25, 2012

The disingenuous, divisive right

They refuse to learn

Yesterday found me prepared for disappointment… and I was not disabused. While the President’s State of the Union message was patriotic and rousing, it offered little of any substance not found in the day-to-day rhetoric of modern politics.

Still, as insubstantial as was the President’s offering, the GOP response stole the show with their tepid behavior, not even showing any emotion when the bin Laden operation was mentioned. Mitch Daniels offering the "official" response could have been a Chuck Norris wind up doll for all the originality he displayed while reciting worn out talking points with a face as grim as I've seen. Even the goper’s staunch allies over a Faux News couldn’t buy yet another ration of the cold gruel that has become the well-practiced response to anything the President says or tries to accomplish.

There are a bunch of folks in this country who vote Republican by principle and for the most part these are genuine, caring humans wishing only the best for this country and the world. It is unfortunate that they cannot see through the smokescreen raised by the powerful few who would rather see the nation lost and our people ruined rather than to offer even the slightest hint of cooperation with the current administration. 

To this element of our society it seems they feel that so long as there is a [fill in the blank] in the White House… the country is already lost. So they wrap themselves in the flag and point to any attempt at compromise as unpatriotic.

This describes a significant segment of America’s politicians, who find ready support from an under-informed electorate and a smattering of nationalistic terrorists. Add to that a religious right faction with the notion of bringing the country down so that they can rebuild it as a theocracy and you end up with a GOP so blinded that it offers a response that can be called nothing short of worthless.

The only surprise was that Michelle Bachmann didn’t appear to offer a follow-up to the Republican response.
###

UPDATE: Awaking to the news that American forces had pulled yet another coup, rescuing an American and a Dane from the clutches of Somali pirates rather cheered me up from the post-State of the Union funk.

###

UPDATE 2: Apparently there was a Tea Party response following SOTU, offered by none other than Herman Cain and broadcast only on the Tea Party Express website. I'm certain this will enliven the base.

###

September 10, 2009

Talk about chapping ass



Olbermann is often far off the left end of the scale for my taste, and this one is pretty raw. However, he has a pretty good grasp of the wingnutia represented by idiots like Wilson, Bachmann, Palin and Beck.

Nothing more to add.
~~

November 30, 2009

The conservative dilemma

Little Green Footballs has a new post defining the reason so many rational conservatives are abandoning the current radicalized right wing. It hasn't been all that long that LGF blogger Charles was a champion for the right, but now he is demonized by them as a traitor to the cause because he dares point out the dangerous path the GOP is following.

His current dissection of the problem is poignant, and a couple of the comments are pretty much dead on too.

Why I Parted Ways With The Right


1. Support for fascists, both in America (see: Pat Buchanan, Robert Stacy McCain, etc.) and in Europe (see: Vlaams Belang, BNP, SIOE, Pat Buchanan, etc.)

2. Support for bigotry, hatred, and white supremacism (see: Pat Buchanan, Ann Coulter, Robert Stacy McCain, etc.)

3. Support for throwing women back into the Dark Ages (see: Operation Rescue, anti-abortion groups, Dobson, Robertson, the entire religious right, etc.)

4. Support for anti-science bad craziness (see: creationism, climate change denialism, Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, James Inhofe, etc.)

5. Support for homophobic bigotry (see: Sarah Palin, Dobson, the entire religious right, etc.)

6. Support for anti-government lunacy (see: tea parties, militias, Fox News, Glenn Beck, etc.)

7. Support for conspiracy theories and hate speech (see: Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Birthers, creationists, climate deniers, etc.)

8. A right-wing blogosphere that is almost universally dominated by raging hate speech (see: Hot Air, Free Republic, Ace of Spades, etc.)

9. Anti-Islamic bigotry that goes far beyond simply criticizing radical Islam, into support for violence and genocide (see: Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, etc.)

10. Hatred for President Obama that goes far beyond simply criticizing his policies, into racism, hate speech, and bizarre conspiracy theories (see: witch doctor pictures, tea parties, Birthers, Michelle Malkin, Fox News, World Net Daily, Newsmax, and every other right wing source)

And much, much more. The American right wing has gone off the rails, into the bushes, and off the cliff.

I won’t be going over the cliff with them.


Barry Goldwater is long in our past, and the worthwhile fiscal conservatism of the Goldwater generation has fallen victim to the dangerous wingnuts of the religious right and the so called "social conservatives" of today. The right now suffers from a "win at any cost" attitude, and this country is suffering because of it.

The left has their wingnuts too, and the battier one side gets the further over the cliff the other side drives. Reasonable political discussion with the good of the nation as a central goal has all but vanished. GWB trounced on our Constitution, doing more damage to this country than any previous president, but BHO is failing terribly in living up to the promise of meaningful change.

A move to the center by both factions is desperately needed, but with almost two generations of Americans now of voting age having never been exposed to true bipartisanship in our political system, the likelihood of reason returning to the debate is nil.

The nut seldom falls far from the tree. Que sera, sera ...

~~

August 2, 2011

Maybe not so smart

Those religious right dominionists in the Republican party, including Rick Perry, Sarah Pain, Michelle Bachmann and even Mick Huckabee would do well to harken back to the experience of our second President. Advocating for a “Christian Nation” may provide short term popularity, but over the long run it is not real smart. 

“It was connected with the general assembly of the Presbyterian Church, which I had no concern in. That assembly has allarmed and alienated Quakers, Anabaptists, Mennonists, Moravians, Swedenborgians, Methodists, Catholicks, protestant Episcopalians, Arians, Socinians, Armenians, &c, &c, &c, Atheists and Deists might be added. A general Suspicion prevailed that the Presbyterian Church was ambitious and aimed at an Establishment as a National Church. I was represented as a Presbyterian and at the head of this political and ecclesiastical Project. The secret whispers ran through them [all the sects] “Let us have Jefferson, Madison, Burr, any body, whether they be Philosophers, Deists, or even Atheists, rather than a Presbyterian President.” This principle is at the bottom of the unpopularity of national Fasts and Thanksgiving. Nothing is more dreaded than the National Government meddling with Religion. This wild Letter, I very much fear, contains seeds of an Ecclesiastical History of the U.S. for a Century to come.”


Read the full meal deal HERE
###

August 24, 2012

Debunking historical revisionism

I've ranted openly against the idiocy that is David Barton's historical revisionism, but never could I have I said it as well as this. The article was originally published on Aug. 20 at the website of Other Words, which publishes progressive editorials and offers them to newspapers around the country.

~~~~

David Barton's Make-Believe Version of American History


Despite the fact that he has no academic training in history or related fields at all, Barton has become the go-to man for much of the religious far right.


By Mark Potok

David Barton, a self-styled Christian historian who claims to debunk left-wing myths about America, is sure of it: If you studied the Founding Fathers like he has, you would know that “as far as they were concerned, they had already had the entire debate on creationism and evolution.”


And the creationists, Barton says, won.

Just one little problem: Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of the Species, the founding text of the theory of evolution, wasn’t published until 1859. That’s, oh, about three-quarters of a century after the founders were active.The very same day that Barton offered up his unique view of creationism — a term that was first applied to American fundamentalist beliefs only in 1929 — he told his interviewer that most of the founders were abolitionists, even if George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and many others were slaveholders. “That’s why we said we want to separate from Britain, so we can end slavery,” he said.

Hmmm. That was awfully noble of them. Except for one thing: The British were way out front of the Americans on this. In 1807, Parliament outlawed the slave trade in the British Empire. In subsequent years, it pressured other European nations to end or curtail the trade. In 1833, Britain abolished slavery completely.

We Americans finally did so in 1865. That was 32 years after the British, which is kind of strange if you believe David Barton’s fairy tales.

Why does any of this matter? It matters because, sad to say, Barton matters — or at least he did, until the conservative Thomas Nelson Publishers yanked his tendentious but best-selling book, The Jefferson Lies, earlier this month. Despite the fact that he has no academic training in history or related fields at all, Barton has become the go-to man for much of the religious far right — an ideologue who claims that the separation of church and state is a “myth” and that the Founding Fathers actually were building an explicitly Christian nation. Prominent politicians like former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, and Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann think he’s brilliant.

He’ not brilliant. He’s not a historian. But he is a right-wing bigot.

That became indisputable in the last month, a very bad period for the man described by conspiracy-monger Glenn Beck as “the most important man in America.” Viewers of the History Channel voted The Jefferson Lies, which depicts the man who actually endorsed a wall between church and state as an enthusiast of America as a “Christian nation,” “the least credible history book in print.” Ten conservative Christian professors denounced its totally unsupported claims. An NPR story obliterated his assertion that the Constitution quoted the Bible. Then his Christian publishing house said it had “lost confidence in the book’s details.”

There’s more. Barton believes that gay people should be sent to prison. He claims that the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the government at all levels. He insists, based on nothing but his own highly unusual reading of the Bible, that environmentalism, the graduated income tax, the minimum wage, deficit spending, unions, and measures to battle global warming are all opposed by God. In Texas, he worked to strip Martin Luther King Jr. from high school history textbooks.

No one is saying David Barton can’t make whatever reckless and false claims he wants. He’s as protected by the First Amendment as any of us. But that doesn’t mean that he has to be taken seriously, given a podium, or boosted as a must-read “historian,” as Huckabee called him. Let’s finally consign Barton’s propaganda to the slag heap of baseless and obnoxious ideas where it belongs, and get on with a serious debate about the future of our troubled country.

###

July 6, 2010

In the year 2034


By Mule Breath
Underground Staff Writer
Blog Against Tyranny
Wednesday, July 5, 2034

LOS ANGELES, CA -- "MY ONE AND ONLY" is a network television phenomenon, one of several recently popular matchmaking programs portraying young people seeking mates, featuring ribald jokes from a comedian host and occasional racy comments from guests.

Audiences loved all the titillation, until last month when government censors came down hard. After a contestant indicated she was angling for a wealthy man with a flashy car, government nannies ordered all matchmaking shows to cut the sexual innuendo, uphold traditional values and ban any open talk of sex or women "gold digging."

This television censorship is the latest and most public example of the government's new crackdown on perceived vice and immorality. It comes even as this country becomes more freewheeling and open, with people increasingly testing boundaries in matters involving style, sex, religion and money.

In March, morality police in Dallas launched a "hard strike" campaign against prostitution, shutting down 33 karaoke bars, massage parlors, game arcades and nightclubs, claiming the establishments were fronts for sex workers.

That same month in Boise, a young couple was jailed briefly for participating in “deviate sexual activities,” after the newlyweds were observed by morality Police surveillance cameras in their honeymoon suite. Both were charged with sodomy and "employing unlawful sexual positions." They were released after pleas of guilty and agreeing to monitored reeducation.

The avowed goals of the ongoing morality campaigns are to "eradicate all social evils" and "advocate a healthy, civilized and high-minded lifestyle," a police spokesman said.

The Internet, while remaining heavily censored, is seen by officials as getting progressively less inhibited. In a white paper published recently by the FBPD (Federal Bureau of Public Decency), that agency called online pornography "a prominent issue of public concern" because it was "seriously damaging the physical and psychological health of young people." FBPD Director Ralph Reed called for a return to traditional family values.

A spate of recent articles in officially sanctioned newspapers and magazines have been advocating a return to traditional moral values and a shift away from the country's commercialization of sex and an ever expanding get-rich-quick ethos.

In an April article in Conservative magazine, the official publication of the ruling Social Republican party, Beloved Leader Palin is quoted as saying that The Party must "resolutely clear out the bawdy pornography, deviate sexual mores," and what she termed, “alternative lifestyles.”

Also, in her regular commentary published in the Christian Youth Daily, Vice President Bachmann said young women who chase after rich men "show they have already knelt down before the devil."

This morality crusade is clearly finding resonance with Christian Conservatives in Midwestern rural areas and southern states. Mainstream media outlets paint a picture of a society fantasizing about the more traditional America of the 20th century, where homosexuals were imprisoned, prostitution was limited to infidel, foreign countries, and open talk about sex was taboo.

Speaking on a podcast circulating within underground partisan groups, Jace Reader, the exiled spokesman for the outlawed Liberal Democrat party, said that the campaign against vice would fizzle because of public pressure from swinging suburbanites who enjoy unimpeded lives of conspicuous consumption. “Although those folks consistently vote for the anti-regulation, pro-corporate Social Republicans, they won’t allow the government to intrude on their free wheeling lifestyles,” said Reader

Various analysts said the crackdown might actually be the government's way of diverting attention from corruption and immorality within its own ranks. "The more the people think the government is morally bankrupt, what they do is have one of these campaigns to crack down on the public's morality," writes “Yvette” on the underground blog, Young Atheists for Democracy. "For ages, the government has condoned a materialistic value system, and now they are reaping the fruits of it. To put the blame on the public is just lame," wrote an anonymous commenter.

Public cynicism about the morality campaign has been fed by repeated reports of top Party officials caught in embarrassing situations -- stories widely circulated on the underground Internet. A brief furor erupted in January when the Dear Leader’s Chief of Staff was caught on video emerging from the trendy Le Monde Salon, a Georgetown massage parlor since shuttered in one of the many recent police prostitution sweeps. "Publicly, they want to build themselves this high moral image," Reader said. "But behind the scenes is a different story."

The persistent rumor that Dear Leader Palin herself once participated in a beauty pageant, an event which has long been outlawed, surfaces every few years. The administration sweeps these claims aside, saying they are fabrications promoted by underground conspiracy theorists. The fact that no published record of such an event can be found does not deter cynics, who claim the archives have been heavily redacted since Palin’s ascent to Holy office in 2012.

 (This broadcast will pause now, as the white-coats have discovered our location and are battering down our door. We must quickly pack our gear, take the escape tunnel and make our way to the safe house…)


~~

December 14, 2012

Another Etch-a-Sketch


It happens so infrequently that when a Republican says or does something that actually promotes a sensible idea… it can be rather startling. It surprises me whenever one of these modern-day religious right crusaders has anything to say that even remotely promotes a woman’s right to choose, but Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has done just that. From the WSJ:

“The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists announced its support last month for selling oral contraceptives over the counter without a prescription in the United States. I agree with this opinion, which if embraced by the federal government would take contraception out of the political arena.”

However, In the same WSJ piece, Jindal goes out on a limb in a twisted and tortured effort to deflect the criticism many GOPers have so justly earned. He does so with a demonstrable lie:

“As a conservative Republican, I believe that we have been stupid to let the Democrats demagogue the contraceptives issue and pretend, during debates about health-care insurance, that Republicans are somehow against birth control. It's a disingenuous political argument they make.”

Is that so? A “disingenuous” argument that “they” make…

Does Brother Bobby not think the American people have memories? Does Mr. Jindal not understand that the people can hear what the religious right has been saying… notice how they have behaved once they achieved majority? Does he think we don’t read? Listen to the radio? Watch television? Is he expecting us to have short memories?

That would be a mistake, Mr. Jindal.

Let us recount just a few of the more recent, and memorable bits of evidence that the current crop of Republicans is top-heavy with old, white bible-thumpers who are either ignorant, stupid, truth-impaired or simply dishonest when it comes to equality and the rights of the alternatively plumbed segment of our population.

Let’s see… the garbage got rolling back in the George W. Bush administration. In 2008 we saw John McCain and Sarah Palin, and four years later we find Rick SantorumNewt GingrichRick Perry and the Texas LegislatureMichelle Bachmann… and even Mitt Romney. The only top tier Republican presidential candidates in a dozen years to not get caught up hook, line and sinker in the shove-it-down-your-throat religious dogma of anti-contraception, anti-choice and anti-equality were John McCain… who moderated his stance after initially voting for the Blunt Amendment, and Jon Huntsman… who actually got a nod for his stance by that far-left ezine, Media matters. Huntsman was also the first to exit the field, reemerging as the Libertarian candidate.

But the clown car is far from empty. Recent history provides us with a wealth of Republicans wanting their women barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen. For instance we have the likes of Jon KylScott WalkerTodd AkinRichard MourdockJan Brewer, a dozen Attorneys General, including Colorado’s John Suthers and Nebraska’s Jon Bruning, "Ultrasound" Bob McDonnell, Lovable Louie Gohmert, wannabe congress critter Danny Rehberg,Tea Party hack Tom Smith, all-around hack Rush Limbaugh [You Tube] and a host of others.

  • For the complete review of state level actions in 2011 click here.
  • For summaries of major state-level actions in 2011, click here.
  • For a table showing reproductive health and rights-related provisions enacted in 2011, click here.
  • For the status of state law and policy on key reproductive health and rights issues, click here.

The 2010 Republican takeover of the Congress, many statehouses and governor’s mansions begat the 2011 onslaught of anti-woman and anti-science bills (where Huntsman again stands a fair distance from the rest of the GOP.)

And then of course there was Jindal himself joining in with the rest of the moronic, anti-science Republicans. These actions have nothing at all to do with demagoguery, Mr. Jindal, and everything to do with religious social engineering. Your comments to the contrary speak of a familiar arrogance.

Brother Bobby is Johnny-come-lately to this dog and pony show. Perhaps the former silence was because he was angling for the VP slot on the Romney ticket (Romney would have fared far better) or maybe he is just bright enough to after-the-fact see the writing left on the walls from the 2012 elections. Whatever his reason I’m glad he is willing now to step back from the anti-equality stance of the Republican religionistas and call them out on that which lost for them.

Still, new spots on an old dog don’t go unnoticed. Until the smackdown of the anti-woman, anti-choice agenda, Jindal supported the “love it or Leave it” GOP in lockstep. Because of that he deserves watching. He might be the real-meal-deal, but we’ve already had to suffer one flip flopper. I’m not all that keen on the thought of having to go through that again.

###

January 4, 2012

What did it cost?

If we look at what the candidates spent per vote for media coverage we get a pretty telling picture of who the real winners and loosers are.

Santorum $1.65
Bachmann $8.00
Romney $113.07
Gingrich $139.00
Paul $227.00
Perry $817.00

Come on back to Texas, Rick. You're embarrassing us.

###

May 29, 2011

Call me Chicken Little, but...

This is a lesser of evils situation.

We need to wake up and smell the coffee. Democrats suck, but if you want to turn the U.S.A. into a Christian version of Saudi Arabia... keep voting Republican. 

Jason Childs is the founder of the Center for Progress in Alabama... and a “Liberty University-trained evangelical pastor.” He has since come to his senses and is telling us what he discovered... and exactly why we should be very afraid.

"… It is so sad that as the people of the world are fighting for freedom, we here in the United States are going in the opposite direction. The far right, under the control of fundamentalists, is declaring an all-out war on human progress."

Eisenhower tried to warn us... but we ignored him. The GOP abandoned a fiscally conservative philosophy in favor of the religious, socially conservative philosophy espoused by the right before Nixon was elected. It was a matter of expedience. The GOP needed the money and the votes... so they made a pact with the devil. Now the fiscal conservative rant is for show, with the real goal being the christification of America. 

The Christian extremist element has been infiltrating our government for many years... long before Eisenhower made that fateful speech as he was leaving office. Nixon was his Vice-President, but Eisenhower would not endorse him in his Presidential bid. Eisenhower recognized from whence the money supporting Nixon came. Nixon lost... Kennedy became President... putting a chink in the conspiracy. It also put into motion a long succession of too-far left politicians. The reaction took time, but the right came back with the religionists even more firmly in control.

The drive to make this land a Christian theocracy has never ceased.  Early evidence is found in the change to coinage design in 1864, when "In God We Trust" was first added. A more recent, major intrusion of Christianity into public life occurred in 1954 with the change in our Pledge of Allegiance... adding "under God" to  Francis Bellamy's original offering. They are persistent.

We turn our back on seemingly minor violations of our Constitution, but these are part and parcel of an overall conspiracy to turn this country more toward authoritarian theocracy and further from the intent of our Founders. If "we the people" do not wake up and it goes far enough... we may have to kiss our Constitution bye bye. 

Each time you hear me criticise Palin, or Huckabee, or Bachmann, it is because their origin and their paths are so clear. George W. Bush answered to "a higher authority." Romney is subtly attacked for being Mormon... something the Religious Right knows would be less than ideal. They want a Bible-wielding crusader.

The Republican party is infested with this conspiracy. All of the major Republican candidates except perhaps Romney are fully owned subsidiaries of the conspiracy, and it is a conspiracy blessed by god. The Religious Right are slick salesmen, and those of this country feeling a need for something in which to believe are swallowing the bait hook, line and sinker.

Mr. Childs has recent, first-hand experience with the conspirators and their goals. Read Jason's story HERE.

The left wingnuts of the Democrats (tree huggers, gun grabbers, etc.) are dangerous in their own way, but our Constitution does not face near the threat from that side of the spectrum as from the Religious Right. The left is disorganized... factionalized... the right is not, and they are winning the battle because they have won the Bible-thumping hearts of the majority.

The radical left is not the answer. A centrist left with a focus on fiscal conservatism is required, and it would not be all that difficult to move the left closer to the center. I urge you to join the D's and work for that goal. It may not be palatable for you... it wasn't for me... but it is necessary. The specter of Christian theocracy in this country is a far greater threat to the dream of our Founders than the loony-tune left has ever offered.

Lets move the left to the right, and try to save this country's greatness.

###
H/T

December 25, 2011

Evolve your beliefs

The following has posted in this space a couple of times in the past. Last year it was Franklin Graham's  NewsMax appearance trying to peddle the same, tired crap that prompted th repost. This year it is laziness and the ongoing blather spewing from Rick Perry and Michelle Bachmann. It seems to me the message is worthy of repeating.

What’s an atheist to do on Christmas?

Along about this time of the year I find myself amused with the perennial accusations of secularists perpetrating “War on Christmas”. Bill O’Reilly's seasonal schmaltz, an annual event for Bill, appeared on the December 3rd Factor. Poor Bill is forever attempting to crucify some Heinous devil worshiper in his quest to out the godless liberals at the root of American decay. This year’s target is Washington Governor Christine Gregoire.

MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann took O’Reilly to task in a most humorous commentary. The last two years I had the You Tube embedded here, but when Olbermann departed NBC they terminated the channel. Anyway....

Being one of O’Reilly’s devil worshipers, I feel at least somewhat vindicated, and more than a little amused. But still I remain confused. Why is it that we have these ongoing controversies?

My philosophies do not allow for belief in much of anything, certainly not a diety or creator, but I find little reason to fight the religionists. Other than the pre-holiday commercial onslaught and it being overall a pretty boring day, I find little in Christmas to dislike.

I’m by no means alone in this country when I identify myself as non-theist. Surveys have indicated that somewhere around 15% of Americans tic off the “non-religious” box where such is offered. Approximately the same percentage of date-seekers registered with Match.com choose either, atheist, agnostic, spiritual but not religious, or other when asked the faith question.

Personally I’d like to see the results of a survey offering only two choices: Monotheistic or Not Monotheistic.

Christmas is here to stay and the militant in our rank should just lay back and enjoy the inevitable. The Jews have done a good job of adapting, as have immigrant populations of various other faiths.

There is even a company offering atheistic Christmas cards that can be ordered over the WWW [www.atheistholidaycards.com]. Judging by the prices I would speculate the owner is Jewish, but that is one of the ways the Jews have adapted to the Christian holiday.
Some recent surveys have indicated up to 95% of Americans celebrate Christmas in one form or another. Take that earlier 15% into consideration and you can figure about two thirds of the non-believers still celebrate the holiday. The remaining third are just noisy stinkers trying to rile O’Reilly.


Plenty of well known secularists and big name atheists celebrate Christmas. Heck, it’s a Federal holiday, you get presents, get off work most years, are encouraged to drink alcohol...

So what’s not to celebrate?

H/T to Hemant Mehta, AKA the Friendly Atheist and current Chairman of the Foundation Beyond Belief... a charitable organization that doesn't need God to be Good.

~~

April 29, 2009

Michelle Bachmann provides us with such great material.
~~






~~

I will actually be sad to see her political demise, but the inevitable will occur and Minnesota’s 6th district voters will eventually come to their senses. Only a matter of time.

~~

August 11, 2011

Just the latest of a long line


They've been working at it for years. This article references Rick Perry, but several current and recent Republican big guns fit well in this queue. Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, Newt Gingrich and Mike Huckabee to name a few. Trace the history of the names found in this piece and you will find volumes of evidence displaying the homophobic, Islamophobic, supremacist nature of the Christian Dominionist cults these names represent.

The history of dominionism in America is long and sordid.

###

September 27, 2009

Why does god need money for faith healing?

The Minnesota Independent ran an interesting story a few days ago. It seems everybody’s favorite Minnesota politician, Michelle Bachmann, has been instrumental in steering $2.4 million in tax money to her favorite charity, Minnesota Teen Challenge. The money, $2,388,947 to be more accurate, is to support “evangelical” drug treatment programs.


Since I’ve ragged on Michelle a good bit I’ll leave her alone for now and dwell on the facility that received the taxpayer’s money. Here is how Alex Luchenitser, senior litigation counsel for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, sees the program.


Teen Challenge is a program that should not be receiving state money,” he said. “It requires people who participate to convert to Christianity.”


If that is correct, then I fail to see how state support of the facility is legal. Minnesota has a growing atheist community who pay state taxes. I feel certain there are also a goodly portion of the population who have religious beliefs other than Christianity. To require tax money be spent on Christian conversion violates the Establishment Clause.

~~